| | | | | | |

Celeron N3450 vs Core i5-3320M


Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the i5-3320M gets 54.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.4 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
306a9
Core
Apollo Lake
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
58.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3450
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
1.54k
3.21k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
2.86k
9.05k (x3.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.88k
3.94k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.93k (x2.21)
TOTAL
8.06k
20.13k (x2.5)

Multithread

N3450

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.91k
6.08k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
19.02k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
8.85k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.98k (x1.33)
TOTAL
22.92k
37.93k (x1.66)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
10.89k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
9.77k (x2.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
3.98k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.77k (x2.11)
TOTAL
13.11k
28.4k (x2.17)

Multithread

N3450

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
20.23k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
20.83k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
9.49k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
4.04k (x1.41)
TOTAL
39.33k
54.6k (x1.39)

Performance/W
N3450
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
578 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
595 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
115 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
1560 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3450
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
3300 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
2960 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1205 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
8607 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4