| | | | | | |

Celeron N3450 vs Core i5-2410M


Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the i5-2410M gets 36.9 k points.

Summarizing, the N3450 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
206a7
Core
Apollo Lake
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
38.68k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3450
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
1.54k
2.38k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
2.86k
6.6k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.88k
3.48k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.16k (x1.77)
TOTAL
8.06k
15.62k (x1.94)

Multithread

N3450

i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.91k
5.49k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
14.39k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
8.39k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.09k (x1.03)
TOTAL
22.92k
31.35k (x1.37)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
7.98k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
6.55k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
3.28k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.7k (x1.52)
TOTAL
13.11k
20.52k (x1.56)

Multithread

N3450

i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
13.66k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
13.17k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
7.05k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
3.02k (x1.06)
TOTAL
39.33k
36.9k (x0.94)

Performance/W
N3450
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
390 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
376 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
1054 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3450
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
2258 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
933 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
7075 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4