Celeron N3450 vs J1900

Description

The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.

Summarizing, the N3450 is 1.2 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs

N3450

J1900

CPUID

506c9

30679

Core

Apollo Lake

Bay Trail-D

Architecture

Goldmont

Silvermont

Base frecuency

1.1 GHz

2 GHz

Boost frecuency

2.2 GHz

2.42 GHz

Socket

BGA1296

BGA 1170

Cores/Threads

4/4

TDP

6 W

10 W

Cache L1 (d+i)

4x32+4x24 kB

Cache L2

2x1024 kB

Cache L3

0 kB

Date

August 2016

November 2013

Mean monothread perf.

13.11k points

9.75k points

Mean multithread perf.

39.33k points

33.25k points

Non-optimized benchmark

The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs

Monothread

N3450

J1900

Test#1 (Integers)

1.54k

1.24k (x0.81)

Test#2 (FP)

2.86k

1.77k (x0.62)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

1.88k

1.65k (x0.88)

Test#1 (Memory)

1.78k

1.15k (x0.64)

TOTAL

8.06k

5.81k (x0.72)

Multithread

N3450

J1900

Test#1 (Integers)

5.91k

4.68k (x0.79)

Test#2 (FP)

8.55k

6.67k (x0.78)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

5.48k

6.15k (x1.12)

Test#1 (Memory)

2.98k

1.45k (x0.49)

TOTAL

22.92k

18.96k (x0.83)

SSE3 optimized benchmark

The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.

Monothread

N3450

J1900

Test#1 (Integers)

5.95k

4.58k (x0.77)

Test#2 (FP)

3.45k

2.32k (x0.67)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

1.92k

1.72k (x0.89)

Test#1 (Memory)

1.78k

1.14k (x0.64)

TOTAL

13.11k

9.75k (x0.74)

Multithread

N3450

J1900

Test#1 (Integers)

21.38k

17.16k (x0.8)

Test#2 (FP)

9.84k

8.42k (x0.86)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

5.25k

6.22k (x1.19)

Test#1 (Memory)

2.86k

1.44k (x0.5)

TOTAL

39.33k

33.25k (x0.85)

Performance/W

N3450

J1900

Test#1 (Integers)

3564 points/W

1716 points/W

Test#2 (FP)

1640 points/W

842 points/W

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

875 points/W

622 points/W

Test#1 (Memory)

477 points/W

144 points/W

TOTAL

6555 points/W

3325 points/W

Performance/GHz

N3450

J1900

Test#1 (Integers)

2706 points/GHz

1893 points/GHz

Test#2 (FP)

1570 points/GHz

957 points/GHz

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

874 points/GHz

709 points/GHz

Test#1 (Memory)

810 points/GHz

470 points/GHz

TOTAL

5959 points/GHz

4029 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph

Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

Multithread performance graph

Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4