| | | | | | |

Celeron N3450 vs G3900TE


Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.

Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.3 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
506e3
Core
Apollo Lake
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2016
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
49.34k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3450
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1.54k
2.36k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
2.86k
9.79k (x3.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.88k
3.08k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.36k (x1.88)
TOTAL
8.06k
18.59k (x2.31)

Multithread

N3450

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
5.91k
4.45k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
18.16k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
5.48k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.5k (x1.17)
TOTAL
22.92k
31.59k (x1.38)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
8.56k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
12.25k (x3.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
3.17k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.35k (x1.88)
TOTAL
13.11k
27.33k (x2.08)

Multithread

N3450

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
16.42k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
23.61k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
5.75k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
3.55k (x1.24)
TOTAL
39.33k
49.34k (x1.25)

Performance/W
N3450
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
1410 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3450
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4