Celeron N3450 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
100fa0
Core
Apollo Lake
Thuban
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
80.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3450
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.54k
1.98k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
2.86k
4.57k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.88k
2.57k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.51k (x1.97)
TOTAL
8.06k
12.64k (x1.57)
Multithread
N3450
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.91k
11.86k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
27.4k (x3.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
15.39k (x2.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.46k (x1.16)
TOTAL
22.92k
58.11k (x2.54)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
5.17k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
5.33k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
2.76k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.51k (x1.97)
TOTAL
13.11k
16.77k (x1.28)
Multithread
N3450
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
29.82k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
30.79k (x3.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
15.88k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
3.69k (x1.29)
TOTAL
39.33k
80.19k (x2.04)
Performance/W
N3450
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3450
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4