Celeron N3450 vs Athlon II M300
Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the M300 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 2.2 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 2.2 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
100f62
Core
Apollo Lake
Caspian
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
Socket S1G3
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
August 2016
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
17.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
2.66k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
3.84k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
1.97k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.1k (x0.62)
TOTAL
13.11k
9.57k (x0.73)
Multithread
N3450
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
5.04k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
7.46k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
3.75k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
1.48k (x0.52)
TOTAL
39.33k
17.73k (x0.45)
Performance/W
N3450
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
144 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
506 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3450
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
1921 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
550 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
4784 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4