| | | | | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Virtual CPU 2,84GHz


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the 2,84GHz is based on -.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 2.5 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
f4a
Core
Braswell
-
Architecture
Airmont
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.84 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.84 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
6 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
- kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
- kB
Cache L3
kB
- kB
Date
March 2015
-
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
21.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
79.76k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
4.27k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
8.93k (x3.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
2.79k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
5.23k (x3.63)
TOTAL
9.21k
21.22k (x2.3)

Multithread

N3150

2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
19.35k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
40.57k (x4.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
13.15k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
6.7k (x2.61)
TOTAL
31.8k
79.76k (x2.51)

Performance/W
N3150
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W