Celeron N3150 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.2 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.2 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
f4a
Core
Braswell
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.55 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
6 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
- kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
- kB
Cache L3
kB
- kB
Date
March 2015
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
3.87k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
8.17k (x3.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
2.67k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.82k (x1.26)
TOTAL
9.21k
16.53k (x1.79)
Multithread
N3150
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
3.46k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
22.59k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
8.09k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
2.85k (x1.11)
TOTAL
31.8k
37k (x1.16)
Performance/W
N3150
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4