Celeron N3150 vs Pentium E6600
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the E6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.1 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the E6600 gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.1 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
1067a
Core
Braswell
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
March 2015
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
16.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
29.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
3.57k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
7.85k (x3.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
3.14k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.58k (x1.1)
TOTAL
9.21k
16.14k (x1.75)
Multithread
N3150
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
6.99k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
14.66k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.09k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
1.66k (x0.65)
TOTAL
31.8k
29.4k (x0.92)
Performance/W
N3150
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
108 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
226 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
94 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
26 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
452 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
2561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
1023 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
5263 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4