Celeron N3150 vs Pentium E5500
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 18 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.2 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 18 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.2 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
1067a
Core
Braswell
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
20.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.07k
2.56k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
1.74k
6.54k (x3.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
2.76k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.46k
0.91k (x0.62)
TOTAL
5.78k
12.77k (x2.21)
Multithread
N3150
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.99k
4.32k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
10.8k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
4.7k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
0.87k (x0.33)
TOTAL
18k
20.69k (x1.15)
Performance/W
N3150
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
664 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1052 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
442 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
3000 points/W
318 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
516 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
836 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
723 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
702 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
2777 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4