Celeron N3150 vs Xeon E5506
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.8 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.8 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
106a5
Core
Braswell
Gainestown
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
90.45k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1.07k
1.21k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
1.74k
2.75k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
1.94k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.46k
0.78k (x0.53)
TOTAL
5.78k
6.68k (x1.16)
Multithread
N3150
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3.99k
12.25k (x3.07)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
25.55k (x4.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
17.1k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
5.01k (x1.89)
TOTAL
18k
59.9k (x3.33)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
4.48k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
2.99k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
1.81k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
0.69k (x0.48)
TOTAL
9.21k
9.97k (x1.08)
Multithread
N3150
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
41k (x2.77)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
28.17k (x3.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
17.4k (x2.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
3.88k (x1.51)
TOTAL
31.8k
90.45k (x2.84)
Performance/W
N3150
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
1131 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4