Celeron N3150 vs Xeon E5504
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.3 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.3 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
106a5
Core
Braswell
Gainestown
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
10.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
41.95k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
4.57k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
3.07k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
1.85k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.43k (x0.99)
TOTAL
9.21k
10.92k (x1.19)
Multithread
N3150
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
19.07k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
12.52k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
7.97k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
2.39k (x0.93)
TOTAL
31.8k
41.95k (x1.32)
Performance/W
N3150
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
524 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4