Celeron N3150 vs Pentium 4 HT 630
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the 630 is based on NetBurst.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the 630 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 3.5 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the 630 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 3.5 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
f43
Core
Braswell
Prescott
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
1/2
TDP
6 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
16+8 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
2005
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
7.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
9.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
630
Test#1 (Integers)
1.07k
1.56k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
1.74k
2.78k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
1.34k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.46k
0.92k (x0.63)
TOTAL
5.78k
6.6k (x1.14)
Multithread
N3150
630
Test#1 (Integers)
3.99k
1.27k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
3.26k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
1.58k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
0.9k (x0.34)
TOTAL
18k
7.01k (x0.39)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
630
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
2.1k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
3.33k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
1.58k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
0.91k (x0.64)
TOTAL
9.21k
7.92k (x0.86)
Multithread
N3150
630
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
1.85k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
4.47k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
1.92k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
0.9k (x0.35)
TOTAL
31.8k
9.14k (x0.29)
Performance/W
N3150
630
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
22 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
53 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
23 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
11 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
109 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
630
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
699 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
305 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
2640 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4