| | | | | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Core 2 Duo T7250


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the T7250 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is 2.3 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
6fd
Core
Braswell
Merom
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
Socket P
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2007
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
7.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
13.82k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1.07k
1.96k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
1.74k
2k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
1.96k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.46k
1.22k (x0.84)
TOTAL
5.78k
7.14k (x1.24)

Multithread

N3150

T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
3.99k
3.87k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
3.95k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
3.8k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
1.34k (x0.51)
TOTAL
18k
12.96k (x0.72)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
2.27k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
2.07k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
2.01k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.22k (x0.85)
TOTAL
9.21k
7.57k (x0.82)

Multithread

N3150

T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
4.51k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
4.09k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
3.9k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
1.32k (x0.51)
TOTAL
31.8k
13.82k (x0.43)

Performance/W
N3150
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
117 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
395 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
611 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4