| | | | | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Core 2 Duo E8400


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the E8400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.2 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
1067a
Core
Braswell
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
17.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
27.11k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.07k
2.47k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
1.74k
6.74k (x3.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
2.87k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.46k
4.47k (x3.06)
TOTAL
5.78k
16.55k (x2.87)

Multithread

N3150

E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.99k
4.64k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
12.36k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
4.86k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
1.96k (x0.74)
TOTAL
18k
23.82k (x1.32)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
3.3k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
7.28k (x3.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
2.88k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
3.83k (x2.66)
TOTAL
9.21k
17.28k (x1.88)

Multithread

N3150

E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
6.3k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
13.71k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.32k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
1.78k (x0.69)
TOTAL
31.8k
27.11k (x0.85)

Performance/W
N3150
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
97 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
82 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
417 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
2426 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4