Celeron N3150 vs Core i5-520M
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the i5-520M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-520M is 1 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-520M is 1 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
20652
Core
Braswell
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
FC-PGA 988
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
15.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
33.14k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
6.67k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
4.59k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
2.49k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
2.18k (x1.51)
TOTAL
9.21k
15.93k (x1.73)
Multithread
N3150
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
13.75k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
10.03k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.67k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
2.68k (x1.05)
TOTAL
31.8k
33.14k (x1.04)
Performance/W
N3150
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
393 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
287 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
947 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
1567 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
742 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
5433 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4