| | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Core i5-450M


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the i5-450M is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 32.3 k points while the i5-450M gets 30.8 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is 1 times faster than the i5-450M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
20655
Core
Braswell
Arrandale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
Jun 2010

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
3904
6327 (62.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
2291
4223 (84.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579
2395 (51.70%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1465
1830 (24.94%)
TOTAL
9239
14774 (59.91%)

Multithread

N3150

i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
14886
13207 (-11.28%)
Test#2 (FP)
8727
9779 (12.06%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5922
5320 (-10.16%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2745
2519 (-8.24%)
TOTAL
32280
30825 (-4.51%)

Performance/W
N3150
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
2481 points/W
377 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1455 points/W
279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
152 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
5380 points/W
881 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
1877 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
1583 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
759 points/GHz
898 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
686 points/GHz
TOTAL
4442 points/GHz
5540 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8