| | | | | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Core i5-10400T


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7.2 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
a0653
Core
Braswell
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.07k
4k (x3.73)
Test#2 (FP)
1.74k
14.19k (x8.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
4.62k (x3.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.46k
11.03k (x7.55)
TOTAL
5.78k
33.84k (x5.86)

Multithread

N3150

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.99k
22.77k (x5.71)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
96.59k (x15.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
31.65k (x6.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
2.45k (x0.92)
TOTAL
18k
153.46k (x8.53)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
12.61k (x3.23)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
17.94k (x7.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
4.83k (x3.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
10.81k (x7.51)
TOTAL
9.21k
46.19k (x5.01)

Multithread

N3150

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
74.62k (x5.05)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
119.63k (x13.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
32.65k (x5.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
2.52k (x0.98)
TOTAL
31.8k
229.42k (x7.21)

Performance/W
N3150
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
2132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
3418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
933 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
4984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
12831 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4