| | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Core i3-4030U


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 32.3 k points while the i3-4030U gets 36.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 1.1 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
40651
Core
Braswell
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2014

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1073
2145 (99.92%)
Test#2 (FP)
1739
5396 (210.24%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1503
2370 (57.68%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1460
2015 (37.95%)
TOTAL
5776
11925 (106.48%)

Multithread

N3150

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3985
3940 (-1.14%)
Test#2 (FP)
6310
13676 (116.73%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5050
5781 (14.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2653
2439 (-8.10%)
TOTAL
17999
25836 (43.54%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3904
6698 (71.56%)
Test#2 (FP)
2291
5985 (161.23%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579
2651 (67.92%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1465
2133 (45.57%)
TOTAL
9239
17467 (89.05%)

Multithread

N3150

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
14886
14300 (-3.93%)
Test#2 (FP)
8727
13830 (58.47%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5922
6124 (3.41%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2745
2484 (-9.52%)
TOTAL
32280
36738 (13.81%)

Performance/W
N3150
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
2481 points/W
953 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1455 points/W
922 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
408 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
5380 points/W
2449 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1877 points/GHz
3525 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
3150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
759 points/GHz
1395 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
TOTAL
4442 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8