Celeron N3150 vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the 4200+ is based on K8.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.8 times faster than the 4200+. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.8 times faster than the 4200+. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
40fb2
Core
Braswell
Brisbane
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
Socket AM2
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2007
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
17.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
1.07k
1.13k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
1.74k
3.76k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
1.72k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.46k
0.67k (x0.46)
TOTAL
5.78k
7.28k (x1.26)
Multithread
N3150
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
3.99k
2.18k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
7.1k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
3.34k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
0.7k (x0.26)
TOTAL
18k
13.32k (x0.74)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
2.88k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
3.98k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
2k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
0.72k (x0.5)
TOTAL
9.21k
9.57k (x1.04)
Multithread
N3150
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
5.58k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
7.67k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
3.88k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
0.7k (x0.27)
TOTAL
31.8k
17.83k (x0.56)
Performance/W
N3150
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
86 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
60 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
11 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
274 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
1308 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
1807 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
911 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
4352 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4