Celeron N3060 vs Pentium D 925
Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the 925 is based on NetBurst.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the 925 gets 14 k points.
Summarizing, the 925 is 1 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the 925 gets 14 k points.
Summarizing, the 925 is 1 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
f65
Core
Braswell
Presler
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
16+8 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2016
October 2006
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
7.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
14.03k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
925
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
2.06k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
3.32k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
1.52k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
0.8k (x0.89)
TOTAL
10.15k
7.7k (x0.76)
Multithread
N3060
925
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
4k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
6.32k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
2.91k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
0.81k (x0.89)
TOTAL
13.36k
14.03k (x1.05)
Performance/W
N3060
925
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
42 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
67 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
31 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
148 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3060
925
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
686 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
507 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
266 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
2565 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4