| | | | | | |

Celeron N3060 vs Core 2 Duo T7100


Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the T7100 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.

Summarizing, the N3060 is 1 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c4
6fd
Core
Braswell
Merom
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2016
May 2007
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
7.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
12.9k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
2.08k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
1.86k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
1.86k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.25k (x1.38)
TOTAL
10.15k
7.05k (x0.69)

Multithread

N3060

T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
4.16k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
3.73k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
3.73k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.28k (x1.41)
TOTAL
13.36k
12.9k (x0.97)

Performance/W
N3060
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
119 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
107 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
369 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3060
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
3916 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4