| | | | | | |

Celeron N3060 vs Core 2 Duo E8200


Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.9 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c4
10676
Core
Braswell
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2016
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
25.39k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
3k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
6.62k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
2.55k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
3.6k (x3.99)
TOTAL
10.15k
15.77k (x1.55)

Multithread

N3060

E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
5.83k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
12.64k (x3.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
4.97k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.95k (x2.14)
TOTAL
13.36k
25.39k (x1.9)

Performance/W
N3060
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
391 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3060
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4