Celeron N3060 vs Core 2 Duo E6550
Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the E6550 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the E6550 gets 16.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E6550 is 1.2 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the E6550 gets 16.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E6550 is 1.2 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
6fb
Core
Braswell
Conroe
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.333 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
2.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2016
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
10.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
16.38k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
2.7k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
2.43k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
2.44k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
2.74k (x3.03)
TOTAL
10.15k
10.31k (x1.02)
Multithread
N3060
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
5.39k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
4.85k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
4.89k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.26k (x1.38)
TOTAL
13.36k
16.38k (x1.23)
Performance/W
N3060
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
83 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
75 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
75 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
252 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3060
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1156 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
4417 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4