| | | | | | |

Celeron N3060 vs Core 2 Duo E6300


Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the E6300 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the E6300 gets 12 k points.

Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.1 times faster than the E6300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c4
6f2
Core
Braswell
Conroe
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.866 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
1.866 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2016
July 2006
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
6.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
12.05k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
2.09k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
1.94k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
1.79k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.05k (x1.17)
TOTAL
10.15k
6.87k (x0.68)

Multithread

N3060

E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
3.65k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
3.76k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
3.61k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.03k (x1.13)
TOTAL
13.36k
12.05k (x0.9)

Performance/W
N3060
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
56 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
55 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
185 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3060
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1121 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
564 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
3684 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4