Celeron N3060 vs N4100
Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 3 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 3 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
706a1
Core
Braswell
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2016
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
4.72k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
6.99k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
2.69k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
2.81k (x3.11)
TOTAL
10.15k
17.21k (x1.7)
Multithread
N3060
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
12.54k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
17.99k (x4.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
6.71k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
3.33k (x3.65)
TOTAL
13.36k
40.57k (x3.04)
Performance/W
N3060
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3060
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4