Celeron N3060 vs J1900
Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 2.5 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 2.5 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
30679
Core
Braswell
Bay Trail-D
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
2.42 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
January 2016
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
9.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
33.25k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
4.58k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
2.32k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
1.72k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.14k (x1.26)
TOTAL
10.15k
9.75k (x0.96)
Multithread
N3060
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
17.16k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
8.42k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
6.22k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.44k (x1.59)
TOTAL
13.36k
33.25k (x2.49)
Performance/W
N3060
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
1716 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
842 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
622 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
3325 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3060
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1893 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
470 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
4029 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4