Celeron N3060 vs C Series C-60
Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the C-60 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.6 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the N3060 is 1.6 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
500f20
Core
Braswell
Ontario
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
1.33 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
9 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Date
January 2016
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
4.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
8.53k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
1.32k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
1.94k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
1.07k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
0.45k (x0.5)
TOTAL
10.15k
4.79k (x0.47)
Multithread
N3060
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
2.36k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
3.52k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
1.92k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
0.73k (x0.8)
TOTAL
13.36k
8.53k (x0.64)
Performance/W
N3060
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
262 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
391 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
213 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
948 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3060
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
342 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
3599 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4