Celeron N3060 vs A6 9210
Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.9 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.9 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
670f00
Core
Braswell
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
January 2016
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
4.87k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
10.38k (x3.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
2.59k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
2.38k (x2.64)
TOTAL
10.15k
20.22k (x1.99)
Multithread
N3060
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
7.41k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
11.87k (x3.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
3.35k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
2.6k (x2.86)
TOTAL
13.36k
25.23k (x1.89)
Performance/W
N3060
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3060
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4