Celeron N2840 vs Xeon E5472
Description
The N2840 is based on Silvermont architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N2840 gets a score of 16.8 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 2.9 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N2840 gets a score of 16.8 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 2.9 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30678
10676
Core
Bay Trail-M
Harpertown
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.58 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
7,5 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
July 2014
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
10.36k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.79k points
48.62k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N2840
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4.8k
2.88k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
2.47k
6.36k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.55k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
4.83k (x3.96)
TOTAL
10.36k
16.62k (x1.6)
Multithread
N2840
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
11.19k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
4.19k
24.85k (x5.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
10.04k (x3.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.32k
2.54k (x1.93)
TOTAL
16.79k
48.62k (x2.9)
Performance/W
N2840
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1177 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
598 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
436 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
2399 points/W
608 points/W
Performance/GHz
N2840
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1861 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
958 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
723 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
472 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
4015 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4