Celeron N2840 vs Core 2 Quad Q9550
Description
The N2840 is based on Silvermont architecture while the Q9550 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N2840 gets a score of 16.8 k points while the Q9550 gets 49 k points.
Summarizing, the Q9550 is 2.9 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N2840 gets a score of 16.8 k points while the Q9550 gets 49 k points.
Summarizing, the Q9550 is 2.9 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30678
1067a
Core
Bay Trail-M
Yorkfield
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.833 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.58 GHz
2.833 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
7,5 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2014
March 2008
Mean monothread perf.
10.36k points
17.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.79k points
48.98k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N2840
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
4.8k
3.28k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
2.47k
7.28k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.83k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
3.9k (x3.2)
TOTAL
10.36k
17.29k (x1.67)
Multithread
N2840
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
11.72k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
4.19k
24.91k (x5.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
9.77k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.32k
2.57k (x1.95)
TOTAL
16.79k
48.98k (x2.92)
Performance/W
N2840
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
1177 points/W
123 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
598 points/W
262 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
436 points/W
103 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
2399 points/W
516 points/W
Performance/GHz
N2840
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
1861 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
958 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
723 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
472 points/GHz
1375 points/GHz
TOTAL
4015 points/GHz
6103 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4