| | | | | | |

Celeron N2840 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The N2840 is based on Silvermont architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N2840 gets a score of 16.8 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 4.8 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
30678
100fa0
Core
Bay Trail-M
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.58 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
7,5 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2014
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
10.36k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.79k points
80.19k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N2840
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.8k
5.17k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
2.47k
5.33k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.76k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
3.51k (x2.88)
TOTAL
10.36k
16.77k (x1.62)

Multithread

N2840

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
29.82k (x3.62)
Test#2 (FP)
4.19k
30.79k (x7.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
15.88k (x5.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.32k
3.69k (x2.81)
TOTAL
16.79k
80.19k (x4.78)

Performance/W
N2840
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1177 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
598 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
436 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
2399 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
N2840
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1861 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
958 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
723 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
472 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
4015 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4