| | | | | | |

Celeron J3455 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2


Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.

Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.3 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
f4a
Core
Apollo Lake
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Architecture
Goldmont
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.55 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
10 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
- kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
August 2016
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
37k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
3.87k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
8.17k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.67k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
1.82k (x1.24)
TOTAL
12.98k
16.53k (x1.27)

Multithread

J3455

7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
3.46k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
22.59k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
8.09k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
2.85k (x1.37)
TOTAL
47.34k
37k (x0.78)

Performance/W
J3455
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
5286 points/W

Performance/GHz
J3455
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4