| | | | | | |

Celeron J3455 vs Pentium Dual-Core E5400


Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the E5400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the E5400 gets 26.8 k points.

Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.8 times faster than the E5400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
1067a
Core
Apollo Lake
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
14.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
26.78k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
E5400
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
3.09k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
6.94k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.77k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
1.22k (x0.83)
TOTAL
12.98k
14.01k (x1.08)

Multithread

J3455

E5400
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
6.18k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
13.82k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
5.57k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.21k (x0.58)
TOTAL
47.34k
26.78k (x0.57)

Performance/W
J3455
E5400
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
95 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
86 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
412 points/W

Performance/GHz
J3455
E5400
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
1143 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
2570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
450 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
5187 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4