| | | | | | |

Celeron J3455 vs Xeon E5504


Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.

Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.1 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
106a5
Core
Apollo Lake
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
10 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
10.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
41.95k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
4.57k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
3.07k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
1.85k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
1.43k (x0.97)
TOTAL
12.98k
10.92k (x0.84)

Multithread

J3455

E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
19.07k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
12.52k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
7.97k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
2.39k (x1.15)
TOTAL
47.34k
41.95k (x0.89)

Performance/W
J3455
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
524 points/W

Performance/GHz
J3455
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4