| | | | | | |

Celeron J3455 vs Xeon E3-1230 v5


Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.

Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
506e3
Core
Apollo Lake
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
10 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2016
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
37.88k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
2.59k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
3.94k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
1k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
2k (x1.36)
TOTAL
12.98k
9.52k (x0.73)

Multithread

J3455

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
10.4k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
16.64k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
4.51k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
6.33k (x3.03)
TOTAL
47.34k
37.88k (x0.8)

Performance/W
J3455
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
474 points/W

Performance/GHz
J3455
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4