Celeron J3455 vs Core 2 Quad Q6700
Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the Q6700 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 2.4 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 2.4 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
6fb
Core
Apollo Lake
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2016
April 2007
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
10.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
19.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
3.06k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
2.74k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.56k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
1.68k (x1.15)
TOTAL
12.98k
10.05k (x0.77)
Multithread
J3455
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
7.28k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
5.83k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
5.13k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.53k (x0.73)
TOTAL
47.34k
19.77k (x0.42)
Performance/W
J3455
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
77 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
61 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
54 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
208 points/W
Performance/GHz
J3455
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
962 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
632 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4