Celeron J3455 vs Core 2 Duo T5800
Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the T5800 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the T5800 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 3.7 times faster than the T5800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the T5800 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 3.7 times faster than the T5800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
6fd
Core
Apollo Lake
Meron
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
PGA 478
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2016
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
7.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
12.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
2.29k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
2.05k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
1.96k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
1.07k (x0.73)
TOTAL
12.98k
7.37k (x0.57)
Multithread
J3455
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
4.28k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
3.8k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
3.59k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.23k (x0.59)
TOTAL
47.34k
12.91k (x0.27)
Performance/W
J3455
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
122 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
108 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
103 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
369 points/W
Performance/GHz
J3455
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
1023 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
537 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
3684 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4