Celeron J3455 vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.9 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.9 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
10676
Core
Apollo Lake
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
3k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
6.62k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.55k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
3.6k (x2.46)
TOTAL
12.98k
15.77k (x1.21)
Multithread
J3455
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
5.83k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
12.64k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
4.97k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.95k (x0.93)
TOTAL
47.34k
25.39k (x0.54)
Performance/W
J3455
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
J3455
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4