Celeron J3455 vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the E7200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.9 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.9 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
10676
Core
Apollo Lake
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.533 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.533 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
13.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
25.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
2.93k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
6.48k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.6k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
1.45k (x0.99)
TOTAL
12.98k
13.46k (x1.04)
Multithread
J3455
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
5.85k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
12.91k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
5.22k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.23k (x0.59)
TOTAL
47.34k
25.21k (x0.53)
Performance/W
J3455
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
199 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
388 points/W
Performance/GHz
J3455
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
574 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
5315 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4