| | | | | | |

Celeron J3455 vs Core i5-2410M


Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the i5-2410M gets 36.9 k points.

Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
206a7
Core
Apollo Lake
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
38.68k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
7.98k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
6.55k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
3.28k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
2.7k (x1.85)
TOTAL
12.98k
20.52k (x1.58)

Multithread

J3455

i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
13.66k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
13.17k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
7.05k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
3.02k (x1.45)
TOTAL
47.34k
36.9k (x0.78)

Performance/W
J3455
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
390 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
376 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
1054 points/W

Performance/GHz
J3455
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
2258 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
933 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
7075 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4