Celeron J3455 vs Core i3-6006U
Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
406e3
Core
Apollo Lake
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
31.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
68.38k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
7.28k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
10.51k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.81k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
2.88k (x1.97)
TOTAL
12.98k
23.48k (x1.81)
Multithread
J3455
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
14.98k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
23.68k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
6.37k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
2.43k (x1.17)
TOTAL
47.34k
47.46k (x1)
Performance/W
J3455
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
998 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
1579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
425 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
3164 points/W
Performance/GHz
J3455
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
3640 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
11739 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4