| | | | | | |

Celeron J3455 vs Core i3-4030U


Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the i3-4030U gets 36.7 k points.

Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
40651
Core
Apollo Lake
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
46.09k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
6.7k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
5.99k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.65k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
2.13k (x1.46)
TOTAL
12.98k
17.47k (x1.35)

Multithread

J3455

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
14.3k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
13.83k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
6.12k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
2.48k (x1.19)
TOTAL
47.34k
36.74k (x0.78)

Performance/W
J3455
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
953 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
922 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
408 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
2449 points/W

Performance/GHz
J3455
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
3525 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
3150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
1395 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4