Celeron J3455 vs Core i3-10110U
Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.7 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.7 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
806ec
Core
Apollo Lake
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
106.58k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
14.3k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
20.09k (x5.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
5.23k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
4.24k (x2.9)
TOTAL
12.98k
43.87k (x3.38)
Multithread
J3455
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
25.51k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
41.33k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
10.81k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
3.21k (x1.54)
TOTAL
47.34k
80.85k (x1.71)
Performance/W
J3455
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
1700 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
2755 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
5390 points/W
Performance/GHz
J3455
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
4901 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
10699 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4