| | | | | | |

Celeron J3455 vs N5105


Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.

Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.4 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
906c0
Core
Apollo Lake
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
64.09k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
9.83k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
9.74k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
3.65k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
3.88k (x2.65)
TOTAL
12.98k
27.1k (x2.09)

Multithread

J3455

N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
25.04k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
24.7k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
9.29k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
5.06k (x2.43)
TOTAL
47.34k
64.09k (x1.35)

Performance/W
J3455
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
6409 points/W

Performance/GHz
J3455
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4