| | | | | | |

Celeron J3455 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.7 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
100fa0
Core
Apollo Lake
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
80.19k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
5.17k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
5.33k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.76k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
3.51k (x2.4)
TOTAL
12.98k
16.77k (x1.29)

Multithread

J3455

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
29.82k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
30.79k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
15.88k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
3.69k (x1.77)
TOTAL
47.34k
80.19k (x1.69)

Performance/W
J3455
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
J3455
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4