Celeron J3455 vs A9 9420
Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.6 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.6 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
670f00
Core
Apollo Lake
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
August 2016
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
46.33k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
8.41k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
11.48k (x3.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
3.29k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
2.24k (x1.53)
TOTAL
12.98k
25.41k (x1.96)
Multithread
J3455
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
11.25k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
13.69k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
2.09k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.87k (x0.9)
TOTAL
47.34k
28.89k (x0.61)
Performance/W
J3455
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
750 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
139 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
1926 points/W
Performance/GHz
J3455
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
2336 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
3188 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
621 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
7058 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4