Celeron J3455 vs A6 3500
Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the 3500 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.4 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.4 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
300f10
Core
Apollo Lake
Llano
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
4/4
3/3
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
3x64+3x64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
3x1024 kB
Date
August 2016
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
13.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
32.72k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
4.75k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
4.72k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.49k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
1.69k (x1.15)
TOTAL
12.98k
13.65k (x1.05)
Multithread
J3455
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
12.56k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
12.58k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
6.08k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.49k (x0.72)
TOTAL
47.34k
32.72k (x0.69)
Performance/W
J3455
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
93 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
23 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
503 points/W
Performance/GHz
J3455
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
1978 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
704 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4