Celeron J1900 vs Xeon E5506
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.7 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.7 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
106a5
Core
Bay Trail-D
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
10 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2013
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
90.45k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J1900
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1.24k
1.21k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
2.75k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.65k
1.94k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.15k
0.78k (x0.68)
TOTAL
5.81k
6.68k (x1.15)
Multithread
J1900
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
12.25k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
25.55k (x3.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.15k
17.1k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
5.01k (x3.44)
TOTAL
18.96k
59.9k (x3.16)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
4.48k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
2.99k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
1.81k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
0.69k (x0.61)
TOTAL
9.75k
9.97k (x1.02)
Multithread
J1900
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
41k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
28.17k (x3.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
17.4k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
3.88k (x2.68)
TOTAL
33.25k
90.45k (x2.72)
Performance/W
J1900
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
1131 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4