Celeron J1900 vs Xeon E5504
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.3 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.3 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
106a5
Core
Bay Trail-D
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
10 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2013
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
10.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
41.95k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
4.57k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
3.07k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
1.85k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.43k (x1.25)
TOTAL
9.75k
10.92k (x1.12)
Multithread
J1900
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
19.07k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
12.52k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
7.97k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
2.39k (x1.65)
TOTAL
33.25k
41.95k (x1.26)
Performance/W
J1900
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
524 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4